Picture
What really happened during Julian Assanges visit to Sweden earlier this year? Here is a timeline including excerpts of case testimony and information currently in the posession of swedish tabloid Aftonbladet.


With that information in hand it is not very hard to construct a pretty precise timeline covering Julian Assanges visit in Sweden earlier this year.

2010-08-11 (Wednesday)
Julian Assange arrives in Stockholm. He is invited by Anna Ardin (Woman A) of the Brotherhood Movement, an adjunct of the Social Democrat Party. Ardin is to be out of town for a few days and lets Assange stay at her flat on Tjurbergsgatan on Södermalm in Stockholm. Assange uses much of his time to meet with journalists and organisations. He has dinner with friends and a US journalist who wants to talk about his new book on the Bush clan.

Picture
Sofia Wilén
Sofia Wilén (woman B) contacts the socialdemocratparty Brotherhood Movement on or shortly after 11 August to get a ticket to the Assange event. Admission is 'prio press' as Ardin posts on Twitter. Wilén is professedly a photographer and gets a ticket. She lives outside Stockholm (in Enköping) but claims to be a national government employee.

 2010-08-13 (Friday)
Ardin was to return to Stockholm first on Saturday 14 August but gets back early, already on Friday afternoon.

'He was there when I came home', Ardin tells the police. 'We talked a bit and agreed he could continue to stay there.'

Ardin and Assange go to a local eatery for dinner, then return to the flat and have sex. They use a condom but the condom is found to be broken afterwards.

2010-08-14 (Saturday).
Wilén attends the event arranged by Ardin, sits in the front row with her camera and takes pictures of Assange, hangs about afterwards, introduces herself to Assange, gets an invite to a lunch with the entourage at a 'bistro' a few blocks away, she and Assange see a short movie in a local cinema afterwards, then part.

Assange attends a crayfish party in Ardin's courtyard where two members of Sweden's Pirate Party (likely Falkvinge and Troberg) and are also present.

 2010-08-15 (Sunday). Assange, Falkvinge, and Troberg meet in the old town for a photo shoot concerning Sweden's Pirate Party offering server support to WikiLeaks.

Picture
Falkvinge Assange Troberg
Wilén calls Assange but his telephone is turned off. She starts telling her work colleagues about her meet with Assange.

'They told me he must feel like I dumped him, so the ball's in my court if I want see him again', Wilén tells the police.


2010-08-16 (Monday).
Wilén rings Assange again and this time he picks up. He tells her he's going to a meeting in the evening but should be able to connect with her about 20:30. Wilén wanders about in the city, eats some sushi, rings Assange back at 21:00 when he hasn't yet turned up. Assange picks up.

'He said he was in Hornsgatan and the meeting had just ended. He asked me to come and meet him, which I did.'

Wilén and Assange walk to the old town, sit down at Munkbron, talk a while, then take the train to her home in Enköping. Wilén pays for Assange's ticket (SEK107/$10).

Picture
Wilén and Assange have sex that evening with a condom. They have sex again in the following morning but without a condom. After sex in the morning, Wilén goes out and buys, then cooks breakfast - oatmeal and juice. They joke about her possibly being pregnant.

'I was being sarcastic to defuse the situation.'

Wilén and Assange ride together on her bike to the train station. Assange returns to Stockholm alone. Wilén asks Assange if he'll ring her. He says he will.

Assange is to meet Agneta Lindblom Hulthén of the Swedish journalists association at 12:00 noon but doesn't turn up until 16:00. One of his colleagues who'd been at the meeting the previous evening and who'd seen Wilén arrive at Hornsgatan starts looking for him. He tries to reach Wilén as he suspected they'd spent the night together. He rings Assange but Assange doesn't answer.

2010-08-18 (Wednesday)
Wilén calls Ardin and tells her she's had unprotected sex with Assange. She says she's upset he didn't use a condom and is afraid she might have contracted an STD or become pregnant. Ardin admits she too had had sex with Assange. Ardin rings an acquaintance of Assange's after the conversation with Wilén to convey the message to Assange that she wants him to move his things out of her flat.

2010-08-19 (Thursday)
Ardin sends an SMS message to the same acquaintance of Assange's, saying he still hadn't moved his things out.

010-08-20 (Friday)
Assange moves his things out of Ardin's flat. He claims it's first on Friday he hears of her request.

Wilén and Ardin arrive at the Klara police station at 14:00. Wilén wants to file charges of rape; Ardin tags along to be of help.

Picture
They talk to a female police officer who concludes they're both victims of sex crimes and decides to interrogate them separately. Of Wilén the female police officer writes the following in the report.

'She said she'd been raped in her home on the morning of Tuesday 17 August by a man who had sex with her against her wishes.'

The female police officer ends her report with the following.

'Everyone I spoke to was in earnest agreement that this was a case of rape.'

Ardin, who only came along to help Wilén, tells the policewoman she also had sex with Ardin. She tells the policewoman the condom broke during sex and now accuses Assange of deliberately breaking it. The police conduct their interrogation of Ardin the following day on the phone.

The police send out a posse to Stureplan to visit upscale nightclubs in search of Assange. He is not to be found.

(Assange later tells friends about the broken condom but dismisses the idea it broke deliberately. He also insists he in no way raped the other woman either - it was consensual unprotected sex.)

Picture
Maria Kjellstrand
(Niklas Svensson of Expressen gets wind of the story, (through Ardin and Wilén), races back to Stockholm from Harpsund, he or someone else in his office rings up prosecutor on duty Maria Kjellstrand who corroborates the details, the charges, and the identities involved.)

2010-08-21 (Saturday). Svensson's story hits Expressen online 05:00. A few hours later the other Swedish news sites have the story and soon it's all over the globe.

The police are tipped off that Assange is staying at a hotel in Stockholm but he's already checked out by the time they arrive.

Chief prosecutor Eva Finné decides to take over the case and has the files sent to her summer cottage by messenger. She reviews the documents and immediately rescinds the arrest warrant. She adds the following to her decision.

'If the suspect turns up then tell him he's suspected of molestation X 2.'

Picture
The infamous Al Jazeera interview
2010-08-22 (Sunday). Swedish procecutor Karin Rosander is interviewed by Al Jazeera and manages to make a mockery of herself and the whole swedish justice system to a stupefied reporter and studio crew.

Chifprocecutor Eva Finné is rumoured to be highly critical of the initial arrest warrant.

Wilén and Ardin contact lawyer and socialdemocrat politician Claes Borgström in the evening and he agrees to take the case. Borgström is among other things know as the lawyer who silently let his former client Thomas Quick aka "Sätermannen" get innocently convicted of 8 murders

2010-08-23 (Monday). Assange retains Leif Silbersky as counsel and Silbersky immediately poses a rather obvious question.

'Why did the prosecutor corroborate all that confidential information to the media?'

The question is considered obvious because such behaviour is neither normal, acceptable, nor prudent - particularly when the arrest is 'in absentia'. Announcing such an arrest only gives the suspect a chance to flee.

The swedish prosecutor's office refuse to this day to answer this question.

Picture
Chief procecutor Eva Finné
2010-08-25 (Wednesday). A Google search for 'Assange rape' yields 1.2 million hits.

Finné clarifies that she doesn't mean she doesn't believe the women's stories, only that there is nothing criminal in them.

Claes Borgström, based on the same evidence, insists there is something criminal and that it was outright rape in both cases, and demands the case be reviewed by a prosecutor at "utvecklingsenheten". That is a department within the prosecutors office where you can appeal desicions made by the original procecutor.

The case will eventually land on the desk of procecutor Marianne Ny, special procecutor in charge of cases regarding rape and sexcrimes at the procecution appeal office in Gothenburg. Ny is the one that eventually puts out yet another arrest warrant for Julian Assange. Accusing him yet again for rape. More about Marianne Ny and her work to instate the dicriminating swedish laws on "womans peace" here (in swedish).

Borgström is given an advance copy of the Aftonbladet article and replies with the following.

'I want to stress that there are significant details missing in this report, details I base my accusations of rape on, but I am prevented from revealing what these details are.'

Picture
Claes Borgström, feminist equality fighter
Aftonbladet's reporters suggest to Borgström that it's in his clients' best interests to reveal the 'significant details'. Borgström replies with the following.

'It would hurt the investigation to make the information public at this stage. It's my opinion [Finné] was in error. I believe Assange will be charged with having commited  sex crimes.'

Aftonbladet's reporters tell Borgström they wonder how this can be if Ardin insists she's not been raped? Borgström replies with the following statement:

'My client [Ardin] is not a lawyer.'

2010-08-30 (Monday). Assange meets with the police at 17:45. His solicitor Leif Silbersky is simultaneously involved in the 'helicopter robbery' case and can't make it earlier. Assange is told he is suspected of deliberately breaking a condom and denies this is so. He adds that he'll be staying in Sweden to fight the accusations and has no intention of fleeing the country.

Assange also demands guarantees details of the case will not again be leaked to the media - particularly Expressen.

2010-08-31 (Tuesday). Details of the interview the police guaranteed would not be leaked turn up in Expressen.

 


Comments

Karina
06/12/2010 18:10

Måste ju helt klart ha varit tragiskt för Wilén att upptäcka hon inte hade ensamrätt på snubben. Stackars, stackars lilla bitterfitta...hon är typen som blir besatt av en man som visar henne uppmärksamhet. Tragiskt och sorgligt.

Lika sorglig är den bild omvärlden nu får av Sverige. Skall Sverige verkligen löjliggöras på detta sätt? Sex by suprise: "Hoppsan, min penis råkade hamna i din vagina, ber så hemskt mycket om ursäkt, det ska inte upprepa sig! Men kan du vara snäll att inte plocka av dig kläderna och ställa dig på alla fyra på det viset hädanefter?" Men herregud, har nån hört på maken!??

Jag skäms på dessa kvinnors vägnar...

Reply
(M)askulism
06/12/2010 19:45

när kommer resten av repotaget?

Reply
Tommy Jonsson
06/12/2010 19:58

Bra timeline Jokim och fortsättning följer.
Det är bra att den svenska laglösheten på sexualbrottsområdet har belysts och kommer att belysas i internationell press. Det är det enda våra makthavare är rädda för.
En eventuell rättegång kommer som vanligt att ske inför stänga dörrar och med sekretessbelagda förhör med flickorna. Det betyder att en fällande dom inte kan kontrolleras av utomstående som vanligt.

Reply
06/12/2010 20:47

@Maskulinism
Ja visst blir man sugen på att läsa vidare? Jag har gjort en del justeringar och tillägg här och där nu efter att ha fått tid att gå igenom texten igen.

@Jesus
Det var något galet med länken du skickade. Den var alldeles för lång och gjorde att bloggverktyget ballade ur. Kan du skicka den igen i en kortare version?

@Karina
Det verkar för mig snarare som att det är Ardin som är den som blivit svartsjuk och förbannad då hon nås av informationen att Assange haft samlag med Wilén. Det blev ju plötsligt väldigt bråttom att få ut hans saker ur lägenheten. Och baserat på det Ardin skrivit på nätet om "hämnd" och dylikt så verkar det vara den typen av kvinna som man helst inte skall göra förbannad.

@Tommy
Om dom åtalar Assange så ser jag inte hur förundersökningen skall kunna hållas hemlig? =)

Reply
Karina
06/12/2010 21:23

Jocke: klart det är! Menade förstås Ardin :-/

Men sen å andra sidan; var det inte ardin som framhöll att hon INTE hade blivit våldtagen? Eller är jag helt lost just nu? Usch, denna härva. Stackars karl.

Reply
hurskadethärgå
07/12/2010 08:47

Det är inte lätt att förstå sig på dagens människor.
En sak är klar: folk mår jävligt dåligt.
Hela samhället har omvandlats till en gigantisk kloak för "mentalt avfall".
Dags för spolning...

Reply
Madde
07/12/2010 18:27

Assange gripen:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6LssAwfeJc0

Reply
dahodd
07/12/2010 20:19

Swedish police lose big cases.

Palme (loss)
Quick (Win, soon loss)(Norwegian police fail here too)
Assange (in prosess for loss)

Those women will fall... nosedive!!

Reply
F
07/12/2010 21:32

Om du helt plötsligt hanmnat under överhängande dödshot från en eller flera av kinesisk-rysk-amerikansk, mellanöstern-mossad organsationer, terrororganisationer alt. möktiga privata aktörer... var skulle du vilja befinna dig?

insurance?

Reply
08/12/2010 03:57

Thanx for publishing this article; I have been wondering about the details. As a woman, I am wondering why any of these women (including the prosecutors) are not taking responsibility for their part in all of this; and why would they then run to and/or use the federales? Are they doing this for fame? Bucks? Revenge? I a 70 year old, woman, who has played a few and seen a lotta games played. And now in looking back, can see how we can be manipulated to do the bad deeds of others. As we Americans say, "there's something rotten in Denmark here'. My sisters, you have embarrassed me. Where is your grace? Where is your integrity. I am surely holding the vision that any and all of this miscreated and misqualified energy be transformed, right here and right now. Sobeit.

Reply
08/12/2010 10:28

Tyvärr skulle det inte förvåna mig om det har gått till precis så som du skriver.
Sverige är rättlöst land.

Reply
Jonaz
08/12/2010 14:48

Loathing of the White Male has been the leading dogma of social development in Scandinavia for the last generation. Assange seems to have been catastrophically unaware of this and was therefore unable to decipher Scandinavian female stereotypes. Unfortunately, he fell into the hands of the worst kind.

Reply
heinz
08/12/2010 21:41

The USA shows the true face of how they achieve their will....pour.
USA will have to pay it back...

Reply
Sami
09/12/2010 00:10

Vilken jävla hyckleri...det är inte förrän man själv drabbas som man kan fatta hur sjukt systemet i Sverige är...vilka monster! Vilken är bättre, en bankrånare i luva eller en ekobrottsling i kostym? En diktator som öppet dödar oliktänkande eller ett demokratiskt land som avlägsnar motståndare m.h.a. nyskapade lagar (kvinnofridslagen) där fabricerade historier (behöver jag förklara??) leder till en fällande dom............

Reply
fjord monster
09/12/2010 04:15

The notion that celebrity shagging, shameless kiss & tell + hell hath no fury vengeance is the sole specialty of American women has herewith been debunked.
As has the notion that Sweden is the pristine paragon of social progressiveness that we can always hold up as the shining beacon to which all other nations aspire.

Reply
mask off Sweden
09/12/2010 10:25

Dessa och liknande kvinnor kommer att få Sverige att falla i världens ögon. Men är ingen som förstår att dessa är bara Amerikanska händer? Händer som har nått långt ;)

Reply
09/12/2010 19:50

Thanks a lot for your information.
I made a link at: http://joepzander.wordpress.com/2010/12/09/julian-assange-verneukte-papa/
There is I think not so much attention for the fact that Julian Assange was a fatheractivist before wikileaks. And for a reason of course.

Wish you good luck over there. Specially thanks for publishing in English.

from a Dutch Fatherhoodactivist

Reply
09/12/2010 20:49

Joep Zander

No I didn´t know that Assange had a past in the fathers rights movement. Now my respect for the man grew even more.

I thought the Netherlands were one of the most progressed countries when it comes to matters of child custody and the legal system?

Mostly I am referring to this investigation that was made by the state prosecutors office there. Something like that would never happen in Sweden.

http://fkce.wordpress.com/2008/11/20/00007/

Reply
12/12/2010 09:30

Dragon Tattoo territory.

Reply
12/12/2010 14:41

Well some people here think that Sweden is so good for fathers having better Paternal leave for fathers.

My experience is that in the fathermovement people think that their own country is the worst because they can't imagine it might be as bad in the whole western society.

Reality; it is as bad but there are small theoretical differences; I mean in practice the difference is very small. In most country's the percentage disturbance of father-child relations after partner-breakup tends to be between 25-40%.

In being extremely destructive quasi-femninistic (can you still call it feminism?). Sweden might be the worst perhaps.

Reply
phrage
16/12/2010 04:55

thank you for this excellent précis-better than any newspaper i read and better referenced too

Reply
17/12/2010 18:02

I live in the evil empire known as America. Yes Heinz, the govt here should pay it back. They seem to manage to control the media here and it always gets twisted into "he was a dangerous crackpot" whenever one of our people try to fight them.
I think this rape charge would never have flown in America, and that this is a case of a woman getting hurt emotionally and turning vindictive.
But I digress. In America debtors prison for father's who owe is alive and well.
They deny it and here is how the govt twists reality: first a court order is (supposedly) sent to your house to appear in court. You never get one however. Then they have you on " failure to appear" . This is automatic guilt. They do not have to prove you received the mail, they merely have to show it was sent. Next they hit you with probation and make a condition of that probation that you pay in full every month, usually they add some "labor" as punishment also.
If you can make the full payment, it is "contempt of court" and jail.
My husband is out of work. And being threatened with four months in jail.
It is great to hear Assange is interested in this cause.

Reply
Marian
17/12/2010 18:07

Oops. Typo second to last sentence. "if you CAN'T pay..."

Reply
Kassandra
18/12/2010 12:56

Oh Sweden, quo vadis? Its very clear that there is something wrong in your country , people. Also in others by the way ;-)
I guess that you have some ugly agents working there....strange that you just now have had the suicide bomber in Stockholm !
How can the executives follow this Ardin/Wilen bullshit?
But something more important : How can JA be so stupid and penis-guided that he doesnt realize he should keep his "Willy" inside during the fight against the machine? Thats what Bradley Manning sacrifices his freedom for? A f... with 2 swedish girls? So many guys stumbled upon their hormons....its ridiculous. Clinton, Vanunu etc etc
Old sytem ....still working...stupid men!

Reply
Marie
22/12/2010 01:23

Mycket bra sammanfattning, tack!
Jag undrar 2 saker, eller 3. Hur har du gått tillväga i din research? Jag har haft svårt att få grepp på historien och tidningarna litar jag inte på. Har du en svensk version och finns det en uppföljning?

Reply
22/12/2010 14:02

Just nu har jag tagit julledigt. Men det är inte svårt att hitta den senaste informationen om man söker på nätet.

Assange är släppt mot borgen, och har uttalat sig om det svenska rättsväsendet på ett ganska rättframt sätt. Bl a har han påpekat att han i 5 veckor stod till polisens förfogande här i Sverige innan han helt lagligt lämnade landet. Men ingen var intresserad av att höra hans version.

Rätt typiskt för svenska åklagare för övrigt. Dom är inte speciellt noga med objektivitetsprincipen när det gäller brott mot kvinnor.

Reply

"Häxprocesser mot män!"

Av PELLE SVENSSON, advokat



Under täckmantel av fri bevisprövning dömer domstolar utan bevis, anser Pelle Svensson



Skötsamma svenska män har inte längre rätt till en objektiv rättslig prövning. Högsta domstolen ser passivt på medan underrätter dömer i strid med HD:s prejudikat. Vid rättegångar bakom stängda dörrar pågår skådespel där män döms enbart på hämndgiriga kvinnors utpekande, hävdar advokaten Pelle Svensson.



Pelle Svensson är fd advokat. Artikeln är tidigare publicerad i Dagens Nyheter den 28 juni 1992.

Artikeln är redan 10 år gammal men den förtjänar att ges nytt liv genom publicering på Internet eftersom den borde ha varit en väckarklocka för åklagarmyndigheterna och domstolarna redan när den skrevs.



Men, i syfte att vara politiskt korrekta, har de rättsvårdande myndigheterna helt negligerat Pelle Svenssons, prof. Anna Christensens, specialist i rättspsykiatri Tomas Erikssons, och rådmannen Bo Severins varningar vilket har lett till så förödande konsekvenser för åtskilliga män och också barnen som har förlorat sina fäder.

Artikeln återges här med författarens benägna tillstånd.




Helt i det tysta pågår rättsprocesser mot svenska män som inte står 1600-talets häxprocesser långt efter. Debattens vågor har gått höga angående kravet på att kvinnan har rätt att bli trodd när hon anklagar en man för våldtäkt. De vittnespsykologer som tar männens parti och förklarar kvinnan icke trovärdig utsätts för hetsjakt och inkompetensförklaring. Kravet på bevisning har sänkts till en så låg nivå att domstolarna dömer enbart på kvinnans utsaga = utpekande.



Häxprocessernas tidevarv utmärktes ju av att den enda bevisningen mot en häxa var just utpekandet - påståendet - om att hon var häxa.

Under täckmantel av det vi kallar fri bevisprövning tillåter sig svenska domstolar i vår tid att döma utan avgörande bevis. Högsta domstolen medger sedan ej prövningstillstånd eftersom HD ej skall överpröva hovrätternas bevisvärdering. Detta trots att avkunnande domslut strider mot två viktiga huvudregler i svensk brottmålsprocess.



Den tilltalades uppgifter/berättelse gäller så länge inte annat har bevisats.

Vid två konkurrerande alternativ skall domstolen alltid välja det som är förmånligast för den tilltalade.



Jag gör alltså gällande utifrån min yrkesroll som försvarsadvokat att svenska män nu under 1990-talet döms av svenska domstolar till långa fängelsestraff trots att de kan vara oskyldiga. Häxprocesserna genomförs också under hård psykologisk press på domstolarna.



Brutala våldtäkter, ibland också med dödlig utgång, sker varje år, särskilt under försommaren när kvinnorna går lätt klädda. I buskarna smyger då psykopater med en svårt störd kvinnosyn, vilka avvaktar varje liten chans till överfall på kvinnan.



Allmänna opinionen kräver med all rätt att polisen infångar gärningsmannen och att han också får ett hårt straff; Eskilstunamordet nyligen finns i starkt minne.

Dessa brutala och avskyvärda brott gör att den utpekade gärningsmannen i varje våldtäktsmål har hela det psykologiska klimatet emot sig. Jag vågar till och med säga att kvinnors syn på män i allmänhet påverkas i negativ riktning av sådana händelser.



Men det är inte dessa våldtäktsmän jag pratar om, utan det är en farsot värre än pesten som under senare år drabbat oss. Nämligen den situation att kvinnor anmäler sina fd män/sambor sedan de separerat och när de strider om vårdnad av barn eller är djupt oense vad gäller fördelning av boet.

I dessa mål avkunnas nu fällande domar med långa fängelsestraff utan några som helst bevis och i strid mot högsta domstolens praxis.



När en påstådd våldtäkt eller en serie våldtäkter anmäls l&arin

Reply

"Sverige vid skampålen".

Av PELLE SVENSSON, advokat



Män sitter dömda till långa fängelsestraff utan bevis, hävdar Pelle Svensson



Advokaten Pelle Svensson gick i somras till angrepp mot att män inte beviljats resning i högsta domstolen efter att ha blivit dömda för våldtäkt enbart på kvinnans utpekande. Domstolar dömer utan bevis och enbart på trovärdigheten hos den anklagande, skriver han och liknar dessa rättegångar vid häxprocesser i slutna rum. Om inte HD ändrar praxis hotar Pelle Svensson nu med att gå till Europadomstolen i Strasbourg med ett tiotal fall.



Pelle Svensson är fd advokat. Artikeln är tidigare publicerad i Dagens Nyheter den 6 september 1992.

Artikeln är snart 10 år gammal men den förtjänar att ges nytt liv genom publicering på Internet eftersom den borde ha varit en väckarklocka för åklagarmyndigheterna och domstolarna redan när den skrevs. Men, i syfte att vara politiskt korrekta, har de rättsvårdande myndigheterna helt negligerat Pelle Svenssons, prof. Anna Christensens, specialist i rättspsykiatri Tomas Erikssons, och rådmannen Bo Severins varningar vilket har lett till så förödande konsekvenser för åtskilliga män och också barnen som har förlorat sina fäder.

Artikeln återges här med författarens benägna tillstånd.






Den 28 juni i år skrev jag en debattartikel i DN under rubriken Häxprocesser mot män.

Artikeln gällde beviskravet för fällande dom i brottmål där en kvinna pekar ut sin fd man/sambo för grova sexbrott under deras sambotid och när påståendet görs långt i efterhand. Min slutsats var att våra domstolar sänkt beviskravet så långt att det räcker för fällande dom att kvinnan uppfattas som mera trovärdig än mannen. Tekniska bevis från brottsplats - medicinska fynd från gynekologisk undersökning - saknas ju på grund av att anmälan kommer långt efter det att parterna separerat. Vittnen finns inte heller, eftersom brottet oftast skall ha skett i parternas sovrum.



Att kunna dömas enbart på en annan människas utpekande är att likna vid en häxprocess och för vårt lands rättskipning tillbaka till 1800-talet.

Trots att min debattartikel handlade om en snäv krets av våldtäkter (våldtäkter inom parförhållande), så har ledande kvinnliga personligheter gått ut i debatten och medvetet vinklat mitt budskap till att gälla våldtäkter i allmänhet. Det har till och med påståtts att jag står för en ny motvåg där männen har rätt att våldföra sig på sina hustrur.



Det är beklämmande det som skett. Det jag står för är rättspatos och kravet på rättssäkerhet för alla. Därför känns det befriande skönt när äntligen en kvinna törs stiga fram och ställa sig bakom huvuddragen i mina krav och åsikter. Professorn i civilrätt vid Lunds universitet Anna Christensen sätter med sitt debattinlägg i DN 17/8 fingret i ögat på alla dessa kvinnliga debattörer som ensidigt hävdar att kvinnorna har monopol på sanningen, en kvinna ljuger inte, kvinnorna har rätt att bli trodda och så vidare. Hon hävdar med rätta att det traditionellt höga beviskravet vi har i brottmål måste gälla även vid våldtäkt, incest och kvinnomisshandel.



När svenska domstolar dömer mannen till långa fängelsestraff enbart på kvinnans trovärdighet skriver de också in i domskälen att något beaktansvärt motiv för att ljuga inte finns. Detta är helt otroligt när anmälan/brottspåståendet sker i samband med en separation, som ofta i sig inrymmer sviken kärlek, svikna löften, umgängesrätt/vårdnad till barn, underhållsbidrag och delning av boet. Problematiken utvecklar professor Anna Christensen så här: "Relationerna inom en familj kan bli så hatfyllda, så egendomliga och så förvridna att man inte skyr några medel för att skada varandra eller förlorar förmågan att skilja mellan den yttre och den inre verkligheten." Hon säger vidare att fall där kvinna ljuger inte är vanliga, men de finns.



Genom att d&oum

Reply
Name Required
13/01/2011 21:30

This is the actual link.

http://radsoft.net/news/20100914,00.shtml

Were you given permission to copy the complete article? Because that's what you've done. You provide two links to their site but deliberately do not provide a link to the actual article. Because then people would see that they did the work, not you.

Reply
13/01/2011 23:04

The article was not translated when I found it, but written in swedish. Since I found it important to share with the rest of the world, I translated it to english, and recited it. I also added a few facts of my own. I have clearly stated the source in my text as you can see, and I also linked to their swedish website.

Since you now have provided a link to the translated version, that may or may not have existed before, I will certainly link to it from my page.

But I do not agree that this is a copyright infringement or plagianism.
Simply sharing vital information with the world, which it seems like Radsoft is in strong support of.

I am sure that Radsoft is satisfied with this solution? I can not see why they wouldn´t be. It´s a win win situation as I see it.

Reply
Carol Norwell
19/08/2012 15:51

Thank you for translating an interesting and insightful article...and to the guy whinging about copyright... get a life! the article is now having a much better airing...and there was no confusion that this was a translated piece...read it carefully and you will see that...

Reply
reader_by_chance
07/02/2011 21:25

i think you in sweden are out of your mind. in a case like this were there is no doubt that all what happened is consensual sex, only sick people would make rape out of it. and obviously sweden is sick. on the other hand, what could you expect of a country where the police/secret service in a conspiracy killed the head of state (Palme). oh wait - in the usa this is pretty common as we remember since 1963. and in the usa we find the background for this big bunch of lies about rapes that never took place. where even the so called "victim" says there was no rape, but a widely known looser-lawyer sees a chance of press appearance. this case is so obvious, and so ridiculous, that it is redundant to loose any more words about it. but the situation in sweden, were it is considered rape if you (as a man) contradict a woman ... - and this in europe - good god. what a rotten country.

Reply
25/02/2011 05:28

If we could read the secret history of our enemies, we should find in each man's life sorrow and suffering enough to disarm all hostility.

Reply
25/03/2012 20:41

This is the best weblog for anyone who wants to know about this subject. You know a lot its virtually challenging to argue with you . You certainly place a new spin on the topic thats been composed about for many years. Fantastic things, just fantastic!

Reply
Jules
20/08/2012 10:44

Thanks for this timeline. Very interesting indeed. What immediately strikes me is that the names of all the people involved; and all the prosecutor doubts, along with argument and counter-argument, appear to have been played out in public. Which is (in most countries) against the laws of privacy.

Now, who will prosecute the prosecutors? Can I bring a private prosecution and get these obsequious, upstart little creatures arrested?

Reply
Daddy
20/08/2012 12:31

Keep an eye out for the next post. It gets even better.

Will be posted shortly.

Reply
SEX KiTTENno1
24/08/2012 19:11

THE Anna Ardin's torn condom rape case is a cow pie, everybody knows that.
BUT, 2 women raped sounds better than 1.

The Sofia Wilen sex by surprise case is the only shit thrown onto the wall that the evil sourceres can possibly make stick.
The idea that a woman can be asleep next to her lover from earlier that night who then proceeds to insert himself into her have sex again without using a condom despite a previous agreement to do so, is RAPE.
But in order to really determine that, the actions of the "victim" do paint the whole picture.

IF a woman is woken up by a man who is having sexual intercourse with her, she doesn't moan if she wants him to stop, she says STOP!
If she continues with the sex act, but is upset to find out at the end that he didn't use a condom & there's obvious worry of pregnancy & STDs, then she doesn't go out & buy & cook breakfast for him, then bike rides with him to the train station, buys him a ticket & kisses him good bye...

A woman truly worried about pregnancy or STDs does not go to the police 3 days so they can force tests on someone, she goes to the clinic 1st thing.

The second any question is raised on both these accusser's odd behavior, there's cries on how every raped woman acts diferently. BS. Every sane person reacts normally.
If you spend a night of sex with some, then they buy & cook you breakfast, take you to the station, buy you a ticket then kiss you good bye & say call me later. YOU are gonna think you are a good LOVER not a violent RAPiST!
These accusers actions DO matter. In an intimate setting were 2 people are involved & 1 clames RAPE, their actions mean everything, & the only 1 who has consistent actions that prove their story is Julian.
He stayed in Sweeden to clear his name for 6 weeks. Waiting for the prosecutor to question him bu she never did. He never fled, he asked for permission to eave to continue his wikileaks presentations, and he was allowed to leave, only to have an InterPol RED Arrest warrant issued as soon as he left, so the swedish prosecutor could now question him. This is whe Gadaffi only had an ORANGE interpol alert notice.
BS!!

Actions before, during & after a crime do matter. Falsely Accusing a man of RAPE should be considered a Sexual Assault CRiME.
Ardin & Wilen should both be tried for that. If not in Seeden, then in International Court.

BTW
Not wearing a condom after consent of sex is given with the condom, is not a crime in most places, but it should be.
A recent case in the US of a 40+ woman who had sex with a 50+ men who agreed to use a condom but didn't, eventhough he, a doctor, knew he was infected with herpes, & therefore infected her, just settled in civil court where he was ordered to pay her almost 1 million dollars.
That sicko should have also face criminal charges, but he didn't.

Reply



Leave a Reply